Inject

Any data item

Connectors or approved one-off imports load email addresses, cookies, events, CRM rows, products, support, billing, documents, and outcomes.

Store

Attribution paths

Scout stores each item's relationship set, vector, and ordered attribution path in customer-owned PostgreSQL/pgvector. Fortress moves high-load memory into Rust/LanceDB, not KynticAI product operations.

Compare

Rust + LanceDB

Enterprise contains the proprietary Rust relationship, weighting, traversal, and LanceDB path for fast similarity analysis across millions of relationship sets.

Output

Top-example JSON

The engine creates JSON with the best examples, importance bands, confidence, caveats, and ranked task options for the question being asked.

Explain

LLM task brief

Fortress sends JSON to your approved model boundary. The proposed Elite path shows the executive walkthrough from safe discovery to scoped pilot and outcome review.

Product / KynticAI Importance Kernel

KynticAI Importance Kernel

Licence-ready importance scoring for truth-oriented models and lower token use.

Score facts, preserve provenance, select evidence, and compress prompts before model inference.

Model providersAI platformsRAG vendorsEnterprise AI labsPrivate model teams

Licence proof / Kernel

The Kernel sale is the moment a model team sees prompt noise become a context plan.

This page should make the licence path obvious: the host system sends too much evidence, KynticAI selects what matters, and the host model receives a compact, provenance-aware plan without exposing private scoring internals.

Evidence in

question = Should this account receive a renewal-risk explanation?

facts = support case open, usage drop, renewal date near, sponsor note stale

retrieval_noise = old campaign notes, generic account history, duplicate CRM comments

Kernel plan

select = support case + usage drop + renewal date

compress = account history into one short governed summary

defer = old campaign notes and duplicate CRM comments

preserve = source references, missing sponsor note, caveat

Host output

Host model receives: renewal-risk context plan with evidence, provenance, and caveat.

Suggested answer shape: explain the risk, ask for latest sponsor note, recommend account-owner review.

Protected boundary: scoring configuration and private tables stay inside the Kernel.

Data in, data out

Importance Kernel gives model teams a clean before-inference step.

The buyer brings a large pile of facts or summaries. The Kernel ranks what deserves attention, keeps provenance and caveats attached, and returns a compact context plan for the host model.

In

Facts or summaries enter

The host system sends structured facts, governed summaries, retrieved evidence, or RAG results into the Kernel boundary.

Score

KynticAI ranks the evidence

High-signal evidence is promoted, secondary evidence is compressed, and weak or stale material can be deferred.

Plan

A compact context plan is built

The output keeps the selected evidence, source references, caveats, and missing-data notes together.

Out

The host model receives less noise

The model receives a provenance-aware context plan before it spends tokens on the answer.

Example input

RAG answer preparation

retrieved facts = 18 source snippets

question = explain renewal risk for account

source mix = CRM note, support case, usage summary, billing status

risk = too many weak snippets for one prompt

Example output

selected_context = support case + usage drop + renewal date

compressed_context = account history summary

deferred_context = old campaign notes

caveat = latest sponsor note missing

Buyer result

The model team sees a licensable layer that turns retrieval sprawl into a focused context plan before inference.

Problem

Large models consume too much undifferentiated context.

Retrieval systems, agents, and internal workflows can hand a model more facts than it should read in one call. Without ranking, source trails, and caveat discipline, the model spends tokens on context that may be weak, stale, repetitive, or missing the decision boundary.

Solution

Score facts before inference.

KynticAI Importance Kernel scores facts, preserves provenance, selects evidence, and prepares a compact context plan before model inference. It supports truth-seeking, evidence-weighted model behaviour with benchmarkable context efficiency.

Buyer spark

The Kernel gives model teams a licensable context discipline layer.

Model providers and private AI teams can add evidence-weighted context selection before generation, while keeping scoring IP, source ownership, and provider adapters behind the right deployment boundary.

The host model receives selected evidence instead of an undifferentiated prompt dump.

Provenance and caveats travel with the selected context.

Deployment benchmarks can quantify the context-efficiency gains for each model route.

How it works

Evidence-weighted context before model inference.

The Kernel prepares the evidence path before the model writes. The output is a compact, provenance-aware context plan for the host model, not a published view of private scoring tables.

01

Evidence enters as structured facts or governed summaries.

The deployment controls the sources, summaries, policies, and evidence shape before the Kernel receives the input.

02

Importance scoring ranks the evidence by outcome relevance.

Scoring promotes high-signal evidence and keeps provenance, caveats, and review needs attached while private scoring values stay inside the protected boundary.

03

A compact context plan is prepared.

High-signal facts are selected, medium-signal material is compressed, low-signal material is deferred, and caveats remain visible.

04

The host model receives the right evidence before tokens are spent.

The output is a provenance-aware context plan for a deployment-owned model boundary, internal model, OpenAI-compatible gateway, Anthropic-compatible gateway, or approved provider adapter.

Integration

Built for platforms that want to license the layer, not expose the internals.

Embedded Rust library

Link the scoring layer into a host runtime where the platform controls deployment, evidence preparation, and model handoff.

Local sidecar API

Run a local scoring service beside a model gateway, RAG system, internal model, or private AI workflow.

MCP tool surface

Expose governed importance planning through an MCP tool interface for approved agent and workflow environments.

OEM licence

Package KynticAI Importance Kernel for model providers, AI platforms, RAG vendors, enterprise AI labs, and private model teams.

Token reduction path

Context can become smaller because selection happens first.

The Kernel is designed to reduce undifferentiated context by ranking evidence first, compressing useful secondary material, and deferring low-signal items before inference.

Ranked evidence selection

Promote the facts most relevant to the requested outcome before inference begins.

Medium-signal compression

Compress useful but secondary evidence so it can support the answer without flooding the prompt.

Low-signal deferral

Defer weak, stale, or tangential material instead of spending tokens on every available item.

Caveat preservation

Keep uncertainty, missing-source notes, and review needs attached to the selected evidence.

Privacy and IP

The host model receives context, not private scoring tables.

Kernel licensing is designed to keep scoring IP protected while giving the buyer a clear, auditable context plan for local models, internal gateways, OpenAI-compatible gateways, Anthropic-compatible gateways, and approved provider-adapter routes.

Compiled weight tables

Private scoring configuration can be compiled into the Kernel boundary rather than published in prompts or public output.

Protected scoring values

Examples and handoffs use reason categories, importance bands, provenance, and caveats while private scoring values stay inside the Kernel.

Private scoring tables stay inside the Kernel

The host model receives the context plan while the proprietary scoring tables remain in the protected scoring boundary.

Validation

Validate the scoring boundary for the chosen model route.

Kernel validation can start with deterministic scoring and extend into the deployment's approved model route, including local Ollama, internal model gateways, OpenAI-compatible gateways, and Anthropic-compatible gateways.

Deterministic scoring proof

Local proof can confirm repeatable ranking behaviour for the same approved evidence input.

Leak-resistance checks

Validation confirms prompts and public output carry context plans, reason categories, bands, provenance, and caveats rather than proprietary scoring tables.

Local and provider-adapter proof paths

Proof can be scoped for local Ollama, OpenAI-compatible gateways, Anthropic-compatible gateways, or internal model routes under the deployment's approved policy.

Licence the Kernel

Add importance scoring before your model spends tokens.

Discuss embedded, sidecar, MCP, or OEM licensing paths for a model-provider, AI-platform, RAG, enterprise-lab, or private-model deployment.

Evidence Results

KynticAI Importance splits scoring, agentic workflow, Klopp conversation, and forensic pattern analysis.

These examples show the product paths: Kernel scoring, local-first agentic workflow, supportive expression, and evidence-cited pattern analysis.

KynticAI Result
Decision Weighting

Importance scenario - next-best task, contradiction, confidence

Rank what deserves attention first

KynticAI Importance can rank relationship strength, recency, contradiction, and outcome history before a user sees the next task.
KynticAI Result
Positive Response

Importance scenario - chatbot, sales team, reassurance, next step

Make customers feel better after the conversation

A customer-facing chatbot, sales workflow, or support team can score replies for usefulness, reassurance, clarity, and positive next-step momentum.
KynticAI Result
Forensic Patterning

Importance scenario - idea probability, answer reliability, technical claim

Spot which ideas deserve belief

Forensic pattern matching compares ideas, answers, objections, and technical claims against recurrence, contradiction, and model-feedback signals.